Scan coverage — and what isn't scanned
Which assets are being scanned and, more usefully, which are not. Coverage gaps list owned hosts only; disabled and deleted directory computers are left out.
Not another CVE console. The questions leadership actually asks.
A scanner already has a console for individual CVEs. This module answers the questions the console can't: are we scanning everything we should, are we fixing what we find fast enough, and which exposures matter most given who and what they touch.
Which assets are being scanned and, more usefully, which are not. Coverage gaps list owned hosts only; disabled and deleted directory computers are left out.
Some hosts genuinely should not be scanned. Accepting one removes it from the coverage denominator — so AthonisOne records who accepted it, requires the reason before accepting, and lists every exception on its own page. A coverage figure is only as trustworthy as the exclusions behind it.
How the organization tracks against the remediation expectations it set — with remediation broken out by module.
Host-level, rule-driven findings and cross-module correlations, tying exposure to the directory and network context around each host.
Each with the evidence behind it, not just a severity label.
A built-in explainer on every finding — what it is, why it matters, what to do.
Rolled up from the findings and trended over time.
Findings mapped to the framework controls they evidence.
A check that guesses produces false findings, and false findings teach a team to ignore the real ones. These are the places this module holds back.
Findings from this module evidence the vulnerability-management and technical-controls areas of every activated framework.
Licensed on its own, and on the same platform as every other module. We'll show you the answer — and what it would say it couldn't measure.